IN RE ERVIN JACKSON & HENRY MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of JAVCOBY L. ERVIN, EUREKA R.
JACKSON, COREENA SHIMOND HENRY,
RAYMOND E. HENRY, JR., LAQUISHA MARIE
HENRY and SHANIKA N. HENRY, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
February 26, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 212328
Berrien Juvenile Court
LC No. 96-000093 NA
ANGEL THOMAS,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
JOHN DOE, WESLEY JACKSON and HENRY
RAYMOND, SR.,
Respondents.
Before: McDonald, P.J., and Hood and Doctoroff, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a juvenile court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument
pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I), In re Miller, 433 Mich 331; 445 NW2d
161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was
clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re
-1
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the juvenile court did not
err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Harold Hood
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.