IN RE ASHLEY NICOLE; HEATHER ANN & BRIDGET LOUISE MISTURA MINORS

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of ASHLEY NICOLE MISTURA, HEATHER ANN MISTURA, and BRIDGET LOUISE MISTURA, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED February 9, 1999 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 211950 Tuscola Juvenile Court LC No. 89-005152 NA LOUIS MISTURA, JR., Respondent-Appellant. Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Saad and P. H. Chamberlain,* JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals by delayed leave granted the juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (c)(i) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(i), (c)(i) and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997); In re Vasquez, 199 Mich App 44, 51-52; 501 NW2d 231 (1993). In addition, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of his parental rights was clearly * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, supra. Therefore, the juvenile court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id. Affirmed /s/ Roman S. Gribbs /s/ Henry William Saad /s/ Paul H. Chamberlain -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.