IN RE WHITNEI & GARTH CASSEL MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of WHITNEI ERIN CASSEL and
GARTH CASSEL, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
February 9, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 208538
Ingham Juvenile Court
LC No. 00-004459
JAMES CASSEL,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
SANDRA CASSEL,
Respondent.
Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Saad and P. H. Chamberlain,* JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right the juvenile court order terminating his parental rights
to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g)
and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination under
subsections (3)(c)(i) and (g) were established by clear and convincing evidence. In re Hall-Smith, 222
Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997); In re Vasquez, 199 Mich App 44, 51-52; 501
NW2d 231 (1993). In addition, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of his parental
rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, supra. Therefore, the juvenile court did not err in terminating
respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Roman S. Gribbs
/s/ Henry William Saad
/s/ Paul H. Chamberlain
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.