IN RE DANTZLER MINORS

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of RAFAEL DEWON DANTZLER and MONTANEL KUARON DANTZLER, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED September 25, 1998 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 206497 Wayne Juvenile Court LC No. 92-305076 SARAH DANTZLER, Respondent-Appellant, and KEVIN HUNTLEY, Respondent. Before: Whitbeck, P.J., and McDonald and T. G. Hicks*, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right the juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b) (3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm. We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Appellant has completed some elements of her treatment plan but had not addressed the most important element, the ability to parent. Two examples, of many, illustrate this point well: (1) on supervised visits with her children, she paid more attention to the adults than to her visiting * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ children; (2) she frequently, and increasingly, cancelled her visits with her children, eventually not visiting with them at all at the critical period just before the juvenile court proceedings. Second, appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5). In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Appellant’s total failure to plan, though given almost five years to do so, for the arrival of her children indicates her inability to meet her responsibilities. Thus, the juvenile court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children. Affirmed. /s/ William C. Whitbeck /s/ Gary R. McDonald /s/ Timothy G. Hicks -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.