IN RE WILLIAMS/RILEY MINORS

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of MICHAELENE WILLIAMS, GARY LONNELL RILEY, SHAQIL ANTOINE RILEY, TRACY ALISSE RILEY, and WILLIAM DAVID RILEY, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY UNPUBLISHED June 12, 1998 Petitioner-Appellee, v YULANDA GLEE RILEY, a/k/a YULANDA GAIL HENDERSON, No. 204434 Wayne Juvenile Court LC No. 88-271477 Respondent-Appellant, and GARY L. RILEY and MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Respondents. Before: Wahls, P.J., and Jansen and Gage, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent mother appeals as of right from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to her children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm. The juvenile court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination set forth at MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g) were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Additionally, because respondent mother failed to rebut the mandatory presumption that termination is clearly in the best interests of the children, -1­ the juvenile court did not clearly err in terminating respondent mother’s parental rights. In re Hamlet (After Remand), 225 Mich App 505, 515; ___ NW2d ___ (1997); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 471-474; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Affirmed. /s/ Myron H. Wahls /s/ Kathleen Jansen /s/ Hilda R. Gage -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.