PEOPLE OF MI V MARIA ELENA SANTOYO
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
June 24, 1997
Plaintiff-Appellee,
No. 185971
Ottawa Circuit Court
LC No. 94-018313 FC
94-018314 FC
MARIA ELENA SANTOYO a/k/a MARIAN
ELENA SANTOYO,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Gage, P.J., and Reilly and Hoekstra, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b; MSA
28.788(2), and second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c; MSA 28.788(3), and
sentenced to ten to twenty-five years’ imprisonment and four to fifteen years’ imprisonment,
respectively. Defendant appeals as of right. We affirm.
Defendant argues that the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury concerning the lesser
included offense of second degree criminal sexual conduct. Defendant did not request the instruction.
She also failed to object when the instruction was not given. Under these circumstances, reversal is
unwarranted absent manifest injustice. People v Haywood, 209 Mich App 217, 230; 530 NW2d 497
(1995). We find no manifest injustice on this record. A trial counsel’s decision not to request a lesser
included offense instruction and to proceed with an all or nothing defense is a legitimate trial strategy.
People v Nickson, 120 Mich App 681, 687; 327 NW2d 333 (1982). Defendant has failed to present
any record evidence that would rebut the presumption of effective assistance. People v Stanaway,
446 Mich 643, 687; 521 NW2d 557 (1994).
Defendant also argues that her ten-year minimum sentence violates the principle of
proportionality. Defendant has failed to overcome the presumption that a sentence within theguidelines
is proportionate to the offense and offender. People v Eberhardt, 205 Mich App 587, 591; 518
NW2d 511 (1994).
-1
Affirmed.
/s/ Hilda R. Gage
/s/ Maureen Pulte Reilly
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.