PEOPLE OF MI V JUAN LEE JORDAN
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
May 13, 1997
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 193374
Ingham Circuit Court
LC No. 95-68822 FC
JUAN LEE JORDAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Corrigan, C.J., and Young and M.J. Talbot*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
The trial court satisfied the articulation requirement by referring to defendant’s criminal history,
defendant’s rehabilitative potential, and society’s need for protection from defendant. People v Coles,
417 Mich 523; 339 NW 2d 440 (1983), overruled on other grounds People v Milbourn, 435 Mich
630; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). Defendant has failed to overcome the presumption that a sentence within
the guidelines is proportionate to the offense and the offender. People v Albert, 207 Mich App 73;
523 NW2d 825 (1994); People v Eberhardt, 205 Mich App 587; 518 NW2d 511 (1994).
The trial court’s failure to respond to defendant’s challenge to the accuracy of the presentence
investigation report does not entitle defendant to resentencing because the asserted inaccuracy had no
determinative effect on defendant’s sentences. People v Daniels, 192 Mich App 658; 482 NW2d
176 (1992); People v Mitchell, 454 Mich 145; ___ NW2d ___ (1997).
Finally, defendant was not deprived of due process when the trial court discussed defendant’s
situation with another judge in the circuit before imposing sentence on defendant, especially in light of the
trial court’s disclosure at sentencing of the content of the conversation. See People v Mills, 145 Mich
App 126; 377 NW2d 361 (1985); MCJC 3.A(4)(c).
Affirmed.
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
/s/ Maura D. Corrigan
/s/ Robert P. Young, Jr.
/s/ Michael J. Talbot
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
