PEOPLE OF MI V MARTONIO DISMUKE

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED March 28, 1997 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 183733 Recorder's Court LC No. 94-004226 MARTONIO DISMUKE, Defendant-Appellant. Before: Marilyn Kelly, P.J., and MacKenzie and J.R. Ernst,* JJ. MEMORANDUM. Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84; MSA 28.279, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2). The judge sentenced him to one to ten years' imprisonment on the assault conviction and a mandatory two year term on the felony-firearm conviction. Defendant appeals as of right. We affirm. Defendant contends that the trial court’s findings of fact with regard to the felony-firearm conviction were insufficient. We disagree. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the findings were sufficient, as the trial court was fully aware of the issues in the case and correctly applied the law. People v Smith, 211 Mich App 233, 235; 535 NW2d 248 (1995). The trial court specifically noted in its findings that the complainant and his girlfriend both saw defendant walk up to the complainant’s car, pull out a gun and start shooting through the rear driver’s side window. The court also found that one of the bullets hit the complainant, at least two bullets hit his car, and a spent shell casing was recovered by an investigating police officer. Therefore, the trial court’s findings were sufficient. Smith, supra. Affirmed. *Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ /s/ Marilyn Kelly /s/ Barbara B. MacKenzie /s/ J. Richard Ernst -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.