PEOPLE OF MI V MICHAEL ALLEN SMITH
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
March 25, 1997
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 186127
Ingham Circuit Court
LC No. 95-068439-FH
MICHAEL ALLEN SMITH,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: D.F. Walsh,* P.J., and R.P. Griffin** and W.P. Cynar,* JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree home invasion, MCL 750.110a(3); MSA
28.305(a)(3), and was sentenced to four to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He appeals as of right. We
affirm his conviction and sentence, but remand for correction of the presentence report. This case has
been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(A).
Because the trial court clearly and unambiguously indicated at sentencing that it was not
considering the alleged inaccuracy that defendant was ever AWOL from Boysville or Yorkwoods, we
remand the case to the trial court solely for the purpose of striking the alleged inaccuracy from the
presentence report. People v Hoyt, 185 Mich App 531, 533; 462 NW2d 793 (1990); People v
Taylor, 146 Mich App 203, 205-206; 380 NW2d 47 (1985). However, the trial court did not err in
scoring ten points for Offense Variable 9 and five points for Offense Variable 17. There was adequate
evidence supporting those scoring decisions. People v Daniels, 192 Mich App 658, 674; 482 NW2d
176 (1992). Finally, the instant sentence is to be served consecutive to the sentence that defendant was
serving at the time of the offense in accordance with Wayne Co Prosecutor v Dep’t of Corrections,
451 Mich 569; 548 NW2d 900 (1996).
*Former Court of Appeals judges, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to
Administrative Order 1996-10.
**Former Supreme Court justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to
Administrative Order 1996-10.
-1
Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, but the matter is remanded for correction of
the presentence report. Jurisdiction is not retained.
/s/ Daniel F. Walsh
/s/ Robert P. Griffin
/s/ Walter P. Cynar
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.