COMMONWEALTH vs. ALFRED HAMILTON.
Annotate this CaseCOMMONWEALTH vs. ALFRED HAMILTON.
353 Mass. 746
November 1, 1967
There was no error in denying the defendant's motion for new trial. This was within the judge's discretion. Commonwealth v. Slaney, 345 Mass. 135 , 142. The testimony, in certain aspects conflicting, gave ample support for the verdict of guilty of assault and battery by means of a bottle.
Order denying motion for new trial affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
