State v. Cook
Annotate this CaseBenjamin Cook pleaded guilty to gross sexual assault and unlawful sexual contact. The superior court imposed an aggregate sentence of twelve years' imprisonment followed by thirty years of supervised release pursuant to Me. Rev. Stat. 17-A, 1231. Cook appealed, contending that the court abused its discretion (1) in determining a maximum and final sentence pursuant to the sentencing analysis required by Me. Rev. Stat. 71-A, 1252, and (2) in imposing a thirty-year term of supervised release because its separate analysis concerning that component of the sentence was insufficient. On appeal, the Supreme Court announced for the first time the analysis a sentencing court is required to undertake before imposing a term of supervised release pursuant to section 1231. In this case, because the superior court did not have the benefit of the full analysis announced and only briefly articulated the case-specific factors leading it to impose a thirty-year term of supervised release, the Court vacated the term of supervised release and remanded for resentencing. The Court affirmed the sentences in all other respects.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.