Sandra Austin v. Barbara Costantino et al.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2004 ME 92 Docket: Yor-03-710 Submitted On Briefs: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 23, 2004 Panel: Reporter of Decisions SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ. SANDRA AUSTIN v. BARBARA COSTANTINO et al. PER CURIAM [¶1] Barbara and Donald Costantino appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) granting Sandra Austin an enlargement of time to complete a settlement agreement. Because a final judgment must adjudicate the respective rights, duties, and liabilities of the various parties, Murphy v. Maddaus, 2002 ME 24, ¶ 12, 789 A.2d 1281, 1284 (internal quotations omitted), there has been no final judgment, and we dismiss the Costantinos appeal as interlocutory. The entry is: Appeal dismissed. 2 Attorney for plaintiff: David W. Austin, Esq. P O Box 638 Rumford, ME 04276-0638 Attorney for defendants: James L. Audiffred, Esq. P O Box 1005 Saco, ME 04072-1005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.