Federal National Mortgage Association v. Downeast Mortgage Corporation
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Paul Weinstein, Esq 30 Danforth Street Suite 104 Portland, ME 04101 JTATE ~- -·---- PISCATAQUIS, SS. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, UPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO RE-16-8 AJ!V John Doonan, Esq 100 Cumming Center, Suite 2250 Beverly, MA 01915 Plaintiff, 1~ Js/t r' v. DECISION DOWNEAST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant. . MORTGAGE ELETRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, • · .Il"J'C. as nominee for DOv\TNEAST MORTGAGE CORP. PAMELA L. ELLIS and WILLARD W. ELLIS, JR. .. ~ . I ; ,, I "V',f , • Parties- In-Interest .- • I The plaintiff has moved for default judgment on its complaint for declaratory judgment. In this case, in which there is a prior MERS assignment, the plaintiff asks the Court to declare that it is the owner of all rights in the note and mortgage that is the subject of the complaint. See Bank ofAmerica v. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89. The complaint was filed to clarify that the note is secured and to ensure that the plaintiff would have standing to file a complaint for foreclosure should there be a default on the subject note. The original mortgagee (Downe~st) as well as the mortgagors and MERS have been served but failed to answer. Also, the plaintiff provided in paragraph 18 of its complaint the averment that it was the current owner of the subject mortgage, which statement is deemed admitted by the defendants' failure to answer. M.R. Civ. P. 8(d). In Greenleaf, the Court ruled that" in the absence of any evidence that the Bank owned Greenleaf' s mortgage, we conclude that the Bank lacked standing to seek foreclosure on the mortgage and accompanying note," Id at :? ·1. ...' •- 6 · rY• <JI 17. Implied in this holding is the proposition that it could be possible on other facts to prove ownership of the mortgage. Because the parties have failed to answer, the Court concludes that they have no interest in taking, or have no reason to take, a position contrary to the Bank's. Under these circumstances, the Court declines to hold further hearings concerning the averrnents in the complaint. In this case, it makes little sense to cause the parties' rights with regard to this property, note, and mortgage to remain unresolved and the Court/ •, Grants the Declaratory relief that the plaintiff seeks. Dated: February 13, 2017 / ~ ~ /'t·/ /) ./ f I um<- --- WILL!AfvI ANDERSON JUSTICE, SUPERIOR COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
