Coggins v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

(··-·-. ..::;.--c-. ( -.. • UNIFED CRIMINAL DOCKET DOCKET NO. CUMCD-CR-CR-2016-3666 STATE OF MAINE c ·uMBERLAND, SS. ) SAQUAN COGGINS, ) ) Petitioner, ) V. ) ) ) .STATE, MOTION TO WITHDRAW PETITION M.R:CRIM.P. 70(d) ) ) Respondent NOW COMES the petitioner, Saquan Coggins, by and through counsel, moves this Court for permission to withdraw petition for post-conviction review with prejudice and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper in the premises. (See, . attached letter). Dated at Bath, Maine thizJ~ of February, 2017. r By:s/David Paris, Esq . (#6781) Attorney for Petitioner 72 Front Street Bath, Maine 04530-2657 MOTION: GRANTED/ O&#E'D CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, David Paris, Esq., depose and $ay that I am Attorney for Petitioner, and made service of the foregoing on the above date by mailing a copy thereof to Jonathan Sahrbeck, ADA, Office of the District Attorney, 142 Federal Street, Portland, Maine 04101. STATE OF MAINE Cumberland. SS. C:hrk's Office RECE1VEO .• I •o - - -.. ' - - - ~ - - - - - - - ' - · q -;.~·_-. ·~ ---- .·d . .. . ._ Q~l.t" . ... D -· •. , . .. -· . - ~--- - - '~ · - -_:________;,_~-·-·. .....- -,.·- - - - _ _ _ ,, .. --'l"' I .' . ·.. .... . ·--·---,,-'-' . ·._·· ·. :. ' . . ,. f .. . . • • ' • .. ' . .... ' ... . . ' . .. . - - ~· - - - ' - c - - r - ---- - . . . ~ecic_D~~~t4_fJtcci,'_ __ . _ _________. . ··. ·:______,-----·-·-. . ·_· .: .. ·. . . •, . . J:-llJ.1Ll·li.JJ:-k~~ ·d-~ ... . ·- -..~pRS±~aitilion_4~~ J.- .. -b~~+ \l . '~:SI . CO +t n u.e 6 -. \·. ·._ ·1 . I - .-.:.....· . o .r L rP-f7f-~Of~ ..~r~u7 s ~ n ~ 903~ · ~~5:b~___Lf)J__ _ ·: _ ~ ~pus±·:-C!Jl'\VLc±wa •~le.l9 .-~ sa.{Lsftd_wi±t1..~ rr:u-f-..·;';:. :__ :_ ~ r• 7~ - 3:- _ l~qg~•~~~oH-~re of no ~ -0:§~~~te ; _ ~ \ aivte~mL4-lJiL.ih.ts. . 1.$_S~ ·~ E .+h.ece-Lfln.~nff,.L"1D-11: ~t_· p: :ned ·ii?- do_ t:e.?-~od +b,~-~pdi#no_pJ~LJ~_ .-to 15_ a~~cturu:d~~~- {Q_:._qlLo£· +be. Ra.dies ~· · n lruLo.bled • r ~_u to ·a.d_lfMce ~c_i:u:ne a:d:J_eo_ b ar-ocet.. ~o-_ 'P-t:(±9.S~\0:9. ·. fo_Jh is .- · . ._ . _ __. · . . .:. · ..· :. · · :.. ·._ . ·. .· · . : . . . ; ' . . ·. r· . • •• •: . . . -.· ' . '• ... . .· . . ... ... ____ · ---'---:-;-------·-----------· ' . . ·_ ·,. _ . .. . ~ ----- ... . . :.-. ·..S~o-~e:ui-, . ~ a--' _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ·., ··-. - - -.-· . .. . '• ,, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -..- . . . .. ---= . - ···. .·..- . ~ - · . ~ - ·--------·

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.