Midfirst Bank V. Sutton
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION Docke~ No. RE-12~0)!8 STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. j tPw-Cufl\- e<lc2 Lf( ~o/L) 1 MIDFIRST BANK, Plaintiff ORDER v. KATHERINEN. SUTTON, Defendant ( and l ·. BENEFICIAL MAINE, INC., Party-in-Interest Before the court is a motion by plaintiff MidFirst Bank for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure brought pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 6321, et seq. No opposition to the motion has been filed. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is subject to Rule 56(j), which imposes detailed requirements for granting summary judgment in foreclosure actions. M.R. Civ. P. 56(j). 1 The court is independently required to determine if those requirements have been met and is also required to determine whether the mortgage holder has set forth in its Statement of Material Facts the acts necessary for summary 1 Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 56(j) states, in part: No summary judgment shall be entered in a foreclosure action filed pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 713 of the Maine Revised Statutes except after review by the court and determination that (i) the service and notice requirements of 14 M.R.S. § 6111 and these rules have been strictly performed; (ii) the plaintiff has properly certified proof of ownership of the mortgage note and produced evidence of the mortgage note, the mortgage, and all assignments and endorsements of the mortgage note and the mortgage; and (iii) mediation, when required, has been completed or has been waived or the defendant, after proper service and notice, has failed to appear or respond and has been defaulted or is subject to default. judgment in a residential mortgage foreclosure. Chase Home Fin. LLC v. Higgins, 2009 ME 136, <Jill, 985 A.2d 508. After reviewing the file, the court concludes that at least one requirement for a summary judgment of foreclosure has not been met for the following reason: The plaintiff has not provided "evidence of properly served notice of default and mortgagor's right to cure in compliance with statutory requirements." Chase Home Fin., 2009 ME 136, 111, 985 A.2d 508; see 14 M.R.S. § 6111; Camden Nat. Bank v. Peterson, 2008 ME 85, 1 21, 948 A.2d 1251. According to statute, a mortgagee must provide notice to the mortgagor and any cosigner by either certified mail, return receipt requested or ordinary first class mail, postage prepaid. 14 M.R.S. § 6111(3). If sent by ordinary firstclass mail, a "post office department certificate of mailing to the mortgagor or cosigner is conclusive proof of receipt on the 3rd calendar day after mailing." 14 M.R.S. § 6111(3)(B). The plaintiff asserts that it sent the notice to the defendant "via U.S. Mail, first-class, postage prepaid" in conformity with the requirements of 14 M.R.S. § 6111; however, the plaintiff did not provide the court with a valid certificate of mailing. (Pl.'s S.M.F. 11 8-9; Kinders Aff. 1 8, Ex. E.). This is true even though the Kinders Affidavit (1 8) asserts that a true copy of the notice of default "with evidence of mailing" is attached. No evidence of mailing is attached in the court's file, and absent evidence of mailing, any assertion by Mr. Kinders that the notice was mailed is hearsay. As the Law Court has stated that a plaintiff's assertion that notice was sent by first-class mail in conformity with the statute "cannot be conclusive at summary judgment without a copy of the certificate [of mailing] itself," the court cannot grant summary judgment here. Camden Nat. Bank, 2008 ME 85, 1 25, 948 A.2d 1251. It may be possible to prove by other means that the notice of default was sent but MidFirst has not done so in this case. 2 BENEFICIAl, MAINE INC -t'o..(~~c/o CT CORPORATION SYSTEM ONE PORTLAND SQUARE PORTLAND, ME 04101 ·,, ·l.rilQ_(e9-\- PETER L HATEM, ESQ tJ~~. 258 US ROUTE ONE SCARBOROUGH, ME 04074-8904 Artoc-<~Qy CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 04101 .. " CLERK OF COURTS Cumberland County 205 Newbury Street, Ground Floor Portland, ME 04101 DAVID E STEARNS, ESQ '?\T~ AINSWORTH THELIN & RAFTICE PA PO BOX 2412 SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04116-2412 · !\+to\ Y)Qy I
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
