DENNIS LLOYD HUSERS, ET AL. VERSUS CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, ET AL.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 16-867 consolidated with 16-866 DENIS LLOYD HUSERS, ET AL. VERSUS CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NOS. 2007-1250 C/W 2006-5675 HONORABLE DAVID A. RITCHIE, DISTRICT JUDGE ********** PHYLLIS M. KEATY JUDGE ********** Court composed of John D. Saunders, Phyllis M. Keaty, and John E. Conery, Judges. AFFIRMED. Hunter W. Lundy Rudie R. Soileau, Jr. Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South 501 Broad Street Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601 (337) 439-0707 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Denis Lloyd Husers Linda Husers E.R. Robinson, III Attorney at Law 125 West School Street Lake Charles, Louisiana 70605 (337) 433-9535 Counsel for Defendants/Appellees: Denis Lloyd Husers Linda Husers Kenneth Michael Wright Kenneth Michael Wright, LLC Attorney at Law 203 West Clarence Street Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601 (337) 439-6930 Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants: Mukesh R. Zaveri Kailish M. Zaveri James David Cain, Jr. Loftin, Cain & LeBlanc, LLC 113 Dr. Michael DeBakey Drive Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601 (337) 310-4300 Counsel for Third-Party Appellee: City of Lake Charles KEATY, Judge. For the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto, Zaveri v, Husers, 16-866 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), __So.3d __, the April 29, 2016 judgment of the trial court in favor of Denis and Linda Husers against Mukesh and Kailash Zaveri, Champion Custom Home Builders, LLC, and The City of Lake Charles (the City) is affirmed in all respects. The August 12, 2016 order denying the Motions for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict filed by Mukesh and Kailash Zaveri and by Denis and Linda Husers is also affirmed. The answer to appeal filed by Denis and Linda Husers is denied. All costs of this appeal are assessed against Mukesh and Kailash Zaveri. AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.