STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CARL ALEXANDER JACKSON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT KA 08-1356 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CARL ALEXANDER JACKSON **************** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 13,996-07 HONORABLE DAVID A. RITCHIE, JUDGE **************** JIMMIE C. PETERS JUDGE **************** Court composed of Oswald A. Decuir, Jimmie C. Peters, and Shannon J. Gremillion, Judges. CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED. John F. DeRosier District Attorney - Fourteenth JDC David Palay Assistant District Attorney Carla S. Sigler Assistant District Attorney 1020 Ryan Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 437-3400 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana Mark O. Foster Louisiana Appellate Project P.O. Box 2057 Natchitoches, LA 71457 (318) 572-5693 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT: Carl Alexander Jackson PETERS, J. The defendant, Carl Alexander Jackson, pled guilty as charged to the offense of distribution of cocaine, a violation of La.R.S. 40:967(A). Thereafter, the trial court sentenced him to serve five years at hard labor, with the first two years of the sentence to be without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The trial court ordered that the sentence run concurrently with sentences the defendant was serving on two other convictions. In this appeal, counsel for the defendant has filed a motion to withdraw together with a brief asserting that after review of the trial court record, he found no non-frivolous errors subject to review on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), and State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1990). This court notified the defendant of his counsel s request to withdraw and advised him of the time limit for notifying this court of his intention to file a brief. The defendant did not timely respond to that notification. OPINION Little is said on the record concerning the underlying facts giving rise to this criminal charge. In fact, the record of the plea and sentencing hearing reflects little more than the fact that the defendant had distributed cocaine on May 27, 2005. What is clear, however, is that the defendant s plea resulted from a plea agreement with the State of Louisiana (state) wherein the state agreed not to pursue other pending charges in exchange for the defendant s plea. Additionally, although it was not made a part of the plea agreement, the state recommended the sentence ultimately imposed by the trial court. In Benjamin, 573 So.2d at 531, the fourth circuit explained the Anders analysis: When appointed counsel has filed a brief indicating that no nonfrivolous issues and no ruling arguably supporting an appeal were found after a conscientious review of the record, Anders requires that counsel move to withdraw. This motion will not be acted on until this court performs a thorough independent review of the record after providing the appellant an opportunity to file a brief in his or her own behalf. This court s review of the record will consist of (1) a review of the bill of information or indictment to insure the defendant was properly charged; (2) a review of all minute entries to insure the defendant was present at all crucial stages of the proceedings, the jury composition and verdict were correct and the sentence is legal; (3) a review of all pleadings in the record; (4) a review of the jury sheets; and (5) a review of all transcripts to determine if any ruling provides an arguable basis for appeal. Pursuant to Anders and Benjamin, we have performed a thorough review of the record, including the pleadings, the minute entries, the charging instrument, and the transcripts. The defendant was properly charged in an indictment and was present, either in person or by simultaneous audio-visual transmission, and represented by counsel at all crucial stages of the proceedings. He entered a free and voluntary guilty plea after properly being advised of his rights in accordance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709 (1969). The defendant received a legal sentence for the offense to which he pled guilty as the incarceration sentencing range for distribution of cocaine is imprisonment at hard labor for two to thirty years, with the first two years being without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. La.R.S. 40:967(B)(4)(b). Thus, the sentence is in the lower range for the offense charged, and the record suggests that the defendant is a third-felony offender. Additionally, the defendant has the benefit of the sentence running concurrently with two other charges. Absent an abuse of discretion, this court will not find a sentence excessive when it falls within statutory limits. State v. Semien, 06-841 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/31/07), 948 So.2d 1189, writ 2 denied, 07-448 (La. 10/12/07), 965 So.2d 397. We find no abuse of discretion in the imposition of this sentence. In accordance with La.Code Crim.P. art. 920, we have also reviewed this appeal for errors patent on the face of the record, but find none. Our review of the record has revealed that there are no issues which would support an assignment of error on appeal. Accordingly, the defendant s conviction and sentence are affirmed, and appellate defense counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. DISPOSITION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the defendant s conviction and sentence in all respects and grant his counsel s motion to withdraw. CONVICTION AND WITHDRAW GRANTED. SENTENCE AFFIRMED; MOTION This opinion is NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Rule 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal. 3 TO KA08-1356 COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee VERSUS CARL ALEXANDER JACKSON Defendant-Appellant On Appeal from the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Docket Number 13996-07, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana, Honorable David Alexander Ritchie, Judge. ORDER After consideration of appellate counsel s request to withdraw as counsel and the appeal presently pending in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellate counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. Appellant s conviction and sentence are affirmed. THUS DONE AND SIGNED this _____ day of _________________, 2009. _______________________________ Judge Oswald A. Decuir _______________________________ Judge Jimmie C. Peters _______________________________ Judge Shannon J. Gremillion
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
