WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. PARTHENA KEEL

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 99-C-1540 WAL-MART STORES, INC. V. PARTHENA KEEL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, DISTRICT 1E PER CURIAM* The judgment of the court of appeal denied Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. the right to reduce claimant s workers compensation benefits under La. R.S. 23:1225(C)(1)(b), based on claimant s receipt of Social Security old-age benefits. Upon Wal-Mart s application, we granted certiorari to review the correctness of this decision. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Keel, 99-1540 (La. 9/24/99), 747 So. 2d 570. After this case was taken under advisement, we rendered our opinion in Pierce v. Lafourche Parish Council, 99-2854 (La. 5/16/00), ___ So. 2d ___. Pierce involved the constitutionality of La. R.S. 23:1221(3)(d)(iii), which also involves the interplay between workers compensation benefits and Social Security old-age benefits. Because the parties did not have the benefit of our opinion in Pierce at the time this matter was tried, we find the interests of justice require that the court of appeal s judgment be vacated and the matter be transferred to the Office of Workers Compensation for further proceedings. Should claimant seek to challenge the * Traylor, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3. constitutionality of La. R.S. 23:1225(C) on remand,1 the workers compensation hearing officer may transfer the matter to the appropriate district court for resolution of this issue. See Albe v. Louisiana Workers Compensation Corp., 97-0581 (La. 10/21/97), 700 So. 2d 824. DECREE For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the Office of Workers Compensation for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1 The record indicates claimant raised the issue of constitutionality in her memorandum filed in the Office of Workers Compensation, although she did not specifically plead the unconstitutionality of the statute as required by Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So. 2d 859. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.