Quentin Thomas Henry, et al. vs. Greater Ouachita Water Company, et al. (Denied)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DocuSign Envelope ID: E006029A-5C44-4DE3-B881-EFBA83CC3BFF STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,781-CW QUENTIN THOMAS HENRY, ET AL VERSUS GREATER OUACHITA WATER COMPANY, ET AL FILED: 01/23/24 RECEIVED: FEDEX 01/22/24 On application of Quentin Thomas Henry for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. C-2015-2025 on the docket of the Fourth Judicial District, Parish of OUACHITA, Judge Jefferson Bryan Joyce. OFFICES OF ANTHONY J. BRUSCATO Anthony J. Bruscato Counsel for: Quentin Thomas Henry, Et al GIEGER LABORDE & LAPEROUSE, LLC Ernest Paul Gieger, Jr. John E. W. Baay, II John Michael DiGiglia Nicholas Stephen Bergeron -andSTEWART LAW GROUP, LLC Arthur Lane Stewart Counsel for: Greater Ouachita Water PHELPS DUNBAR, LLP Steven J. Levine James Alan Harrell David James Topping Gregory J Reda Counsel for: Inframark, LLC Before STEPHENS, THOMPSON, and HUNTER, JJ. WRIT DENIED. The applicant, Quentin Thomas Henry, et al., seeks supervisory review of the trial court’s December 20, 2023, ruling granting Greater Ouachita Water Company and Inframark, LLC.’s “Motion to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for DocuSign Envelope ID: E006029A-5C44-4DE3-B881-EFBA83CC3BFF No. 55,781-CW Page 2 Partial Summary Judgment,” “Motion for an Order for the Deposition of James D. Palmer,” and “Motion for Hearing Pursuant to La. C.C.P. art. 1425(F).” Exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Herlitz Const. Co. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, 396 So. 2d 878 (La. 1981). On the showing made, this writ is denied. Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2024. 27 March ___________________ ___________________ March 27, 2024 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.