YVONNE WILLIS PEEL, ET AL. V. RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. -consolidated with- YVONNE WILLIS PEEL, ET AL. V. RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. (Denied)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: 90D1B680-E629-487C-8190-D54377E5E9B1 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,526-CW consolidated with 55,527-CW YVONNE WILLIS PEEL, STEPHANIE PEEL COLLINS, AND WENDY PEEL VERSUS RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., A.P.L.C. -consolidated withYVONNE WILLIS PEEL, STEPHANIE PEEL COLLINS, AND WENDY PEEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR HUSBAND/FATHER, WILLIAM FREDERICK PEEL (DECEDENT) VERSUS RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND RICHARD L. FEWELL, JR., A.P.L.C. FILED: 08/30/23 RECEIVED: BY EMAIL 08/28/23 On application of Richard L. Fewell, Jr. and Richard L. Fewell, Jr., A.P.L.C. for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. 20224318 on the docket of the Fourth Judicial District, Parish of OUACHITA, Judge Robert C. Johnson. McLEOD VERLANDER David E. Verlander, III Counsel for: Richard L. Fewell, Jr. and Richard L. Fewell, Jr., A.P.L.C. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL W. TIFFT Michael William Tifft Counsel for: Yvonne Willis Peel, Stephanie Peel Collins, Wendy Peel, Individually and on Behalf of William Frederick Peel (D) Before THOMPSON, ROBINSON, and ELLENDER, JJ. DocuSign Envelope ID: 90D1B680-E629-487C-8190-D54377E5E9B1 No. 55,526-CW consolidated with No. 55,527-CW Page 2 WRIT DENIED. The applicant, Richard L. Fewell, Jr., seeks supervisory review of the trial court’s denial of his Exception of Lis Pendens. On the showing made, we decline to exercise this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ is hereby denied. 24 Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. October ___________________ ___________________ October 24, 2023 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.