JUANITA AUGMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. V. GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY, ET AL. (Denied)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: 34E093CD-9D7F-424D-9B68-0F5927D405A2 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,495-CW JUANITA AUGMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF EARL LEROY ANDREWS, A DECEASED PERSON. VERSUS GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY, THROUGH THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA SYSTEM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND JAYLIN M. WAYNE FILED: 08/14/23 RECEIVED: PM 08/11/23 On application of the University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. 60,002 on the docket of the Third Judicial District, Parish of LINCOLN, Judge Bruce Edward Hampton. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Charles Bryan Racer Phyllis E. Glazer Adrian Kemal Alpay Counsel for: University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors HAWKINS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Scott M. Hawkins Counsel for: Juanita Augman, Individually and on Behalf of Earl Leroy Andrews (D) Before STEPHENS, THOMPSON, and ELLENDER, JJ. WRIT DENIED. The applicant, The State of Louisiana, through the University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors, Grambling State University, seeks supervisory review of the trial court’s May 31, 2023, denial of its “Motion for Summary Judgment.” Exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Herlitz Const. Co. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, 396 So. 2d 878 (La. 1981). On DocuSign Envelope ID: 34E093CD-9D7F-424D-9B68-0F5927D405A2 No. 55,495-CW Page 2 the showing made, this writ is denied. The deferred costs of this writ application, in the amount of $180.00, are assessed to the applicant under La. R.S. 13:4521. Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. 24 October ___________________ ___________________ October 24, 2023 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.