STATE OF LOUISIANA V. LAWRENCE NIXON (Granted and Made Peremptory; Remanded with instructions)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B445ED6-DC62-4D5B-8ADF-DDEFDDBA6F02 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,396-KH STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LAWRENCE NIXON FILED: 06/21/23 RECEIVED: PM 06/08/23 On application of Lawrence Nixon for POST CONVICTION RELIEF in No. 45311 on the docket of the Second Judicial District, Parish of JACKSON, Judge Charles Glenn Fallin. Pro se Counsel for: Lawrence Nixon Daniel W. Newell Counsel for: State of Louisiana Before THOMPSON, ROBINSON, and MARCOTTE, JJ. WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS. The applicant, Lawrence Nixon, seeks supervisory review of the trial court’s May 3, 2023, ruling denying his “Motion to Correct Illegal Habitual Sentence.” The Jackson Parish Clerk of Court’s website shows that pursuant to the directive of this Court in its February 24, 2023, writ order, Nixon sought and was granted by the trial court a copy of the minutes and transcript of his habitual offender proceedings. A copy of the transcript was filed in the trial court record on April 4, 2023, and was available for the trial court’s review at the time of the ruling at issue. Thus, we find that the trial court’s reliance on this Court’s February 24, 2023, writ order to deny Nixon’s “Motion to Correct Illegal Habitual Sentence,” was in error. We hereby grant the writ, reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand for reconsideration of Nixon’s “Motion to Correct Illegal Habitual Sentence,” on the merits. We note that the trial court minutes and commitment order provided in support of the writ application before this Court indicate that all three of Nixon’s sentences were imposed with the restriction of parole for the entire term. On its face, this documentation reflects a potential error in Nixon’s sentencing based upon the applicable sentencing laws in effect at the time of Nixon’s offenses, which DocuSign Envelope ID: 7B445ED6-DC62-4D5B-8ADF-DDEFDDBA6F02 No. 55,396-KH Page 2 should be evaluated and or resolved by the trial court after review of the habitual offender bill of information and hearing transcript as well as the 2012 laws applicable to Nixon’s habitual offender adjudication and sentencing. To that end, the trial court is instructed to provide a written ruling on the merits of Nixon’s “Motion to Correct Illegal Habitual Sentence,” clarifying which counts were subject to the habitual offender charge, the proper sentence for each, and to order any necessary correction of the minutes and commitment order. August Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. 9 ___________________ ___________________ August 9, 2023 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
