C. L. BRYANT, ET AL. VS. XTO ENERGY INC., ET AL. (Applications consolidated; Denied; Motion to Stay denied.)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DocuSign Envelope ID: 42B9302A-697A-4442-8D29-F071A00B7C04 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,385-CW consolidated with 55,386-CW; 55,389-CW; 55,402-CW; 55,405-CW; 55,408-CW; and 55,412-CW C. L. BRYANT, ET AL VERSUS XTO ENERGY INC., ET AL FILED: 06/15/23 RECEIVED: BY EMAIL 06/14/23 On application of SWN Production (Louisiana), LLC for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. 79,549 on the docket of the Forty Second Judicial District, Parish of DESOTO, Judge Frank Hardy Thaxton, III, ad hoc. SINCLAIR LAW FIRM, LLC Scott C. Sinclair -andGOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUES & RUNDELL Charles Stovall Weems, III Stephen Alan LaFleur -andBAKER BOTTS, LLP Russell Lewis Louis Edward Layrisson, III Counsel for: SWN Production (Louisiana), LLC TALBOT, CARMOUCHE & MARCELLO William Robert Coenen, III Christopher David Martin -andH. Lynwood Lawrence, Jr. -andLAW OFFICE OF YVES M. VERRET, III, LLC Yves M. Verret, III Counsel for: C.L. Bryant, et al. BRADLEY, MURCHISON, KELLY, & SHEA, LLC Joseph L. Shea, Jr. Sarah Anne Kirkpatrick Joshua Steven Chevallier Matthew R. Lee Counsel for: Nelson Energy, Inc. and Brammer Engineering, Inc. DocuSign Envelope ID: 42B9302A-697A-4442-8D29-F071A00B7C04 No. 55,385-CW No. 55,386-CW No. 55,389-CW No. 55,402-CW No. 55,405-CW No. 55,408-CW No. 55,412-CW Page 2 KEAN MILLER, LLP Richard D. McConnell, Jr. Lauren Jean Rucinski Counsel for: Southern Natural Gas Company, LLC SCHONEKAS, EVANS, MCGOEY & MCEACHIN Maria Garcia Marks Joelle Lee Flannigan Evans Patrick Shaw McGoey Andrea V. Timpa Counsel for: Beusa Energy, LLC DUPLASS, APLC Joseph E. Bearden Daniel M. Redmann Counsel for: Comstock Oil & Gas-Louisiana, LLC SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP Eric Julian Mayer -andKING & SPALDING, LLC Mandie M. Cash Andrew Mark Stakelum Mitchell B. Bryant Counsel for: Chevron Midcontinent, L.P. COOK, YANCEY, KING & GALLOWAY Albert Moore Hand, Jr. John Tucker Kalmbach David Jonathan Hemken William Drew Burnham Counsel for: Search Financial Service, L.P. DUNCAN & SEVIN, LLC Elton Ford Duncan, III Kelley A. Sevin Counsel for: Elm Springs, Inc. HALL, MAINES, LUGRIN, PC Evan Thomas Caffrey Aaron Emil Koenck Caroline E. Bossier George H. Lugrin, IV Counsel for: Beland Energy, LLC FLANAGAN PARTNERS, LLP Thomas More Flanagan Camille Elise Gauthier Counsel for: Jeff Morris and Tony Spears DocuSign Envelope ID: 42B9302A-697A-4442-8D29-F071A00B7C04 No. 55,385-CW No. 55,386-CW No. 55,389-CW No. 55,402-CW No. 55,405-CW No. 55,408-CW No. 55,412-CW Page 3 E. Herschel Lain, Jr. Agent for: Winchester of Louisiana, Inc. Before PITMAN, COX, and HUNTER, JJ. APPLICATIONS CONSOLIDATED; WRITS DENIED. The applicants, SWN Production (Louisiana), LLC; Nelson Energy, Inc.; Brammer Engineering, Inc.; Search Financial Services, L.P.; Beland Energy, LLC; Beusa Energy, LLC; Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.; and Comstock Oil & GasLouisiana, LLC, seek supervisory review of the trial court’s May 16, 2023 “Order” granting the plaintiffs’ “Motion to Recuse,” Judge Amy Burford McCartney. SWN Production (Louisiana), LLC has filed a “Motion to Stay Proceedings” and brief in support, seeking to stay all proceedings in the trial court pending the dispositions of these writ applications. Upon its own motion, this Court hereby consolidates the above-captioned writ applications. In writ applications No. 55,385-CW, No. 55,402-CW, and No. 55,408-CW, counsels’ pro hac vice admission status granted by the trial court is hereby recognized. Exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Herlitz Const. Co. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, 396 So. 2d 878 (La. 1981). On the showing made, these writs are denied. The motion for stay is also denied. 2 August Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. ___________________ ___________________ August 2, 2023 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.