STATE V. TAYLOR JACKSON KERLEY (Motion granted; Remanded with instructions.)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: A2E6F655-D4D3-4FF2-8504-7359D64235E2 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,319-KH Motion to Enforce STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS TAYLOR JACKSON KERLEY FILED: 05/10/23 RECEIVED: PM 04/28/23 On application of Taylor Jackson Kerley for MANDAMUS in No. 222,285 on the docket of the Twenty Sixth Judicial District, Parish of BOSSIER, Judge Robert Lane Pittard. Counsel for: Taylor Jackson Kerley Pro se John Schuyler Marvin Richard Russell Ray Joseph Chancellor Nerren Counsel for: State of Louisiana Before PITMAN, STONE, and ROBINSON, JJ. ORDER Applicant, Taylor Jackson Kerley, complains that the trial court has not complied with this Court’s June 7, 2023, order of mandamus directing the trial court to enter a dispositive ruling on Kerley’s pro se “Motion for Speedy Trial.” Although the trial court set this matter for contradictory hearing on July 24, 2023, the case minutes show that the trial court has still failed to dispose of Kerley’s July 8, 2021, motion. Accordingly, the applicant’s motion to enforce is hereby granted and the case is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter a dispositive ruling on Kerley’s motion for speedy trial within 30 days of this order. If the trial court has previously complied with the order, it is directed to provide a copy of the DocuSign Envelope ID: A2E6F655-D4D3-4FF2-8504-7359D64235E2 No. 55,319KH Page 2 order or ruling to the applicant and his attorney, the district attorney and this Court, within 10 days of this order. September 6 Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. ___________________ ___________________ September 6, 2023 FILED: _____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.