STATE V. BYNOG (Denied in Part; Granted in Part and Made Peremptory)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: 7F688C27-4873-4C46-AA1B-AD90673B6D5E STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,277-KW STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CAROLYN ANN BYNOG FILED: 04/18/23 RECEIVED: E-FILED 04/17/23 On application of Carolyn Ann Bynog for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. 45,496 on the docket of the Eighth Judicial District, Parish of WINN, Judge Anastasia Stacy Wiley. WINN PARISH PUBLIC DEFENDER James Earl Calhoun Richard Christopher Nevils Cole B. Smith Counsel for: Carolyn Ann Bynog Counsel for: State of Louisiana Before PITMAN, STONE, and THOMPSON, JJ. WRIT DENIED IN PART; WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND MADE PEREMPTORY. Applicant Carolyn Ann Bynog seeks review of the trial court’s March 16, 2023 denial of the defense’s Motion to Quash Arrest Warrant and the trial court’s finding that probable cause existed to charge the defendant with perjury in violation of La. R.S. 14:123. Regarding the trial court’s probable cause determination at the preliminary hearing, we find that the record before this court fails to support a finding of probable cause to hold Bynog on a charge of perjury under La. R.S. 14:123 or any lesser offense. A preliminary examination’s purpose is to determine whether probable cause exists for a defendant to be deprived of his liberty. State v. Baham, 13-0901 (La. 6/28/13), 117 So. 3d 505. Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances are sufficient to justify a man of average caution in the belief that the person has committed a crime. Id. The State has a low threshold to adduce prima facie evidence sufficient to justify a man of average caution in the belief that an individual has committed a crime. Id. In relevant part, the crime of perjury is defined in La. R.S. 14:123 as follows: DocuSign Envelope ID: 7F688C27-4873-4C46-AA1B-AD90673B6D5E No. 55,277-KW Page 2 A. Perjury is the intentional making of a false written or oral statement in or for use in a judicial proceeding[.] In order to constitute perjury the false statement must be made under sanction of oath ... and must relate to matter material to the issue or question in controversy. In this matter, there is no evidence before this court that any false statements made by Bynog were material to the question in controversy in the motion to suppress at issue. Accordingly, the writ is granted in part to reverse the trial court’s finding of probable cause to hold Bynog for the crime of perjury. Applicant is ordered released from custody and/or any bail obligation. As it relates to the “Motion to Quash Arrest Warrant,” the writ is denied in part. Shreveport, Louisiana, this ________ day of ________________________, 2023. 1 June ___________________ ___________________ June 1, 2023 FILED: __________________________ __________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.