BRADFORD V. GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE GROUP (Denied)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DocuSign Envelope ID: ED45BF3B-D2BA-43FD-BED2-70A9EB3839C5 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT 430 Fannin Street Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3700 No. 55,204-CW COLUMBUS BRADFORD AND MIKIYA BRADFORD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE VERSUS GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE GROUP, PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY, AND PROGRESSIVE PALOVERDE INSURANCE COMPANY FILED: 03/17/23 RECEIVED: BY HAND 03/17/23 On application of UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company for SUPERVISORY WRIT in No. 164,328 on the docket of the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District, Parish of BOSSIER, Judge Charles A. Smith. PERKINS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Mark Alan Perkins Adrian B. Stull Counsel for: UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company JACK BAILEY LAW CORPORATION Jack M. Bailey, III Counsel for: Columbus Bradford and Mikiya Bradford, Individually and as Husband and Wife Before COX, STEPHENS, and ROBINSON, JJ. WRIT DENIED. The applicants, UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc., and Ace American Insurance Company, seek supervisory review of the trial court’s February 27, 2023, ruling denying their motion for summary judgment. On the showing made, the writ is denied. La. C.C.P. art. 966; Herlitz Construction Co. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, 396 So. 2d 878 (La. 1981). 24 May Shreveport, Louisiana, this __________ day of ______________________, 2023. ___________________ ___________________ May 24, 2023 FILED: ____________________________ ____________________________________ DEPUTY CLERK ___________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
