MAX PREJEAN Vs. MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MAX PREJEAN * NO. 2008-C-0364 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* MCKAY, J., CONCURS I respectfully concur with the majority opinion and would affirm the trial court’s judgment. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the work done by Mr. Prejean for MEI was an integral part of or essential to the ability of Murphy to produce and distribute petroleum products. Accordingly, summary judgment is not appropriate in this case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.