AARON AND KEELY PIERCE, EACH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNERS IN THE COMMUNITY OF ACQUETS AND GAINS EXISTING BETWEEN THEM, AND AARON AND KEELY PIERCE AS THE NATURAL TUTOR AND TUTRIX AND ON BEHALF OF THE MINOR CHILDREN DANIEL AND JOEY PIERCE Vs. IRVIN P. GROS AND THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT/COUNCIL AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
AARON AND KEELY PIERCE, EACH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARTNERS IN THE COMMUNITY OF ACQUETS AND GAINS EXISTING BETWEEN THEM, AND AARON AND KEELY PIERCE AS THE NATURAL TUTOR AND TUTRIX AND ON BEHALF OF THE MINOR CHILDREN DANIEL AND JOEY PIERCE * NO. 2004-CA-2152 * COURT OF APPEAL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* VERSUS IRVIN P. GROS AND THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT/COUNCIL AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY ARMSTRONG, C.J., CONCURS. I respectfully concur in the decision to affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
