JOHN DOE, MARY DOE AND OSCAR C. RUSSELL, JR. Vs. ABC CORPORATION, DEF CORPORATION, XYZ CORPORATION, AND HIBERNIA CORPORATION
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
JOHN DOE, ET AL. * NO. 2000-CA-1905 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL ABC CORPORATION, ET AL. * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * ******* Murray, J., concurs in part with reasons: I agree with the majority's conclusion that there was no palpable error or abuse of discretion in either the trial court's discovery rulings or in this court's dispositions of the prior writ applications. I further agree that because of the unresolved discovery issues, the trial court's consideration of Hibernia's motion for summary judgment was premature. Therefore, I concur in the reversal of the judgment granting that motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
