State Of Louisiana VS Detrenta Lee
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2021 NO. KW 1134 VERSUS DETRENTA In D. Re: LEE 06, State 19th Rouge, BEFORE: WRIT that finding probable officer had a detaining the 3, at * cert. denied, denied, 577 see Whren 1774 ("[ s] court' the defendant s burden there State under v. vehicle no a the U. S. play lacked it 806, no in Thus, probable that a So. 2d and of at a EW DEPUTY CLERK FOR THE OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT 8 S. Ct. ordinary, the cause trial to stop it was reasonable circumstances, failed " the 1305, JMK FIRST 116 because " extremely the clear WIL OF APPEAL, 145, L. Ed. 2d 813, role v. 5801488 So. 3d 194 time to consent abuse of 1307- 08 ( when it the to trial overcome [ was not its] given discretion. La. was remove it for both reasons of safety and security."). COURT WL 178 32: 322( B) was State was place 2014 985, the State curiam); 9/ 18/ 15), 517 Under of 2000- 0356 Waters, 14), S. Ct. R. S. totality 390 per to cause irrelevant. fact the waiver[,]" in La. and " that v. to The suspecting 32: 322( B). analysis."). officer was the Jernigan, was the on" considering was Amendment for expectations 11/ 7/ La. 136 States, violating conclusion 1056 ( failed probable R. S. or intentions outside," lights Further, court' that for dark extremely have bright United ubjective finding s v. La. Cir. 1st 1121, was i. e., legal s erroneous. basis State 1053, App. U. S. stop beliefs 2014- 2595 ( Fourth probable -cause Baton suppress court' 32: 322( B) R. S. violated So. 2d trial objective and to motion The traffic irrelevant. La. writ 2016); 1769, 780 the of activity, had are 2014- 0497 ( East of JJ. La. of the subjective 3/ 12/ 01), La. DuPont, for criminal officer" WOLFE, reversed. violation defendant the law, " the hereby cause of writs, supervisory Parish Court, granting particularized defendant believe AND The is the provide District LANIER, GRANTED. evidence for applying 06- 19- 0107. No. McDONALD, physical the Louisiana, of Judicial 2021 1980) (" necessary and See the to
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
