Douglas Robins, et al VS Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D., et al
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DOUGLAS ET ROBINS, NO. AL VERSUS MOHAMMAD ET ZOHAIR 2021 CW PAGE 1 1274 OF 2 M. D., PIRZADAH, AL CONSOLIDATED DOUGLAS ROBINS AND WITH KATHERINE ROBINS VERSUS DECEMBER MOHAMMAD AND ZOHAIR CHARLES M. D., PIRZADAH, LANE 2021 20 , JR., PEARSON, M. D. In Douglas Re: Robins BEFORE: of herein is 297 and 57, So. 2d of 37, So. 3d c/ w 26, August from 698066. 2021 ruling counsel as serving When a it proven, Walker citing 2001- 2078, La. burden that to Cir. Dept or that motion present evidence party' s claims therein. made Landis Construction the establishing LLC Louisiana, v. State of 2015- 1167 ( La. 1st App. 2/ 29/ 16), 199 documents to introduced. introduced in the 2143 ( cannot of Mohammad Zohair failed M. D., be Vessel v. 983 and record, documents may or meet 84, review not receive M. D. their 88. Charles of formally courts is that not Id. Lane proof, 2007- Inc., Appellate evidence. and burden Cir. attached never Services, evidence new parties were Co., offered and officially it is physically placed Management So. 2d Pirzadah, to although these and properly even if considered, Denoux record appellate Here, not 5/ 21/ 08), La. 2. motions, Evidence record. courts 1, So. 3d their the of 817 5/ 14/ 02), La. exception an 3rd App. State, v. 2001- 2079 ( raises party is 2019- 751 ( Armand, 40, Development, 60. be District JJ. s Hammons Court, The burden of proving disqualification of an officer of the court rests on the party making Succession challenge. 2/ 27/ 20), Transp. court' L. for applying 642149 Nos. THERIOT, trial John Judicial Rouge, AND Robins, reversed. attorney or other must The disqualified which Baton WELCH, GRANTED. WRIT the East McCLENDON, 19th writs, supervisory Parish Katherine and are in Pearson, and the Defendants, Jr., therefore, we The to find the trial court erred in granting the motion. disqualify counsel is denied. motion PMC JEW Theriot, necessary he which Horaist 5th and M. D. v. Cir. concurs. witness when testify could Doctor' s 2001). arguments and J., I is find Lane of from Opelousas, based on defendants, Pearson, Jr., likely not pertaining available that is lawyer evidence Hospital asserted, Charles A the to 255 F. 3d Zohair will be matter source. documents Mohammad M. D., each another to be 261, a to See 267 presented Pirzadah, able to STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 2021 NO. PAGE support other their defense Mr. than the granting 2021 ruling writ which this nullity action Therefore, testimony. against Hammons' the and reversing disqualified John L. counsel. COURT OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT trial court' Hammons using I s from CW 2 1274 OF 2 sources concur August serving in 25, as
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
