Stephen F. Hurstell VS Benjamin J. Legett
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STEPHEN F. HURSTELL NO. 2021 CW 1037 9, 2021 VERSUS BENJAMIN In J. Re: LEGETT Stephen 22nd No. BEFORE: Hurstell, Judicial writ Hurstell, WELCH, IN PART Court, supervisory Parish THERIOT, St. of writs, Tammany, to the WRIT extent DENIED that counsel, IN PART. plaintiff, in contained defendant' s of JJ. ORDER; documents all possession AND WITH application sought in for applying District 2011- 13702. GRANTED the files F. MCCLENDON, WRIT deny NOVEMBER the boxes six that as We Stephen request of is overly broad and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in However, denying that request. to the extent plaintiff, Stephen Hurstell, c), identified d) and information that Benjamin documents because nature or relevant further We defendant or properly he has the of requests, is Legett. 1424( C), art. specific his of not produced disclosed in a find we his to find has assert documents, documents that that to manner as privilege or communications, that, Code without to shown Civ. furnish either describing things not revealing P. those documents, such log b), defendant, against La. a), has plaintiff under privilege a subparagraphs claims failed a in the produced information itself privileged or protected, will enable plaintiff to assess the applicability of the privilege or protection. Therefore, we in reverse part the plaintiff, Stephen defendant, Benjamin requested his by request trial Legett, plaintiff for court' Hurstell' s, in production s April motion produce to any subparagraphs of documents, 8, 2021 denying ruling compel, and non - privileged a), b), and with that order c), documents and regard d) to of any responsive documents withheld in response to plaintiff' s request for production of documents on the basis of privilege, defendant submit a privilege Civ. Code log compliant with La. P. art. 1424( C) 20, to plaintiff, Stephen Hurstell, 2021. PMC JEW MRT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT on or before December
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
