Gustave J. Labarre, Jr., et al. VS Occidental Chemical Company, et al
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT GUSTAVE J. LABARRE, JR., CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL 2021 NO. CW 1023 VERSUS OCCIDENTAL LLC, In ET Re: Texas Brine Assumption, BEFORE: McDONALD, WRIT NOT provisions AND CONSIDERED. of La. District WOLFE, written Relator Courts failed to Parish provide proof P. 4- 2 in Appeal, of Civ. filed was and 4- 3, accordance 1914 ( A) art. judgment for request supervisory Court, trial within court 10 Supplementation for and 9, 4- rehearing Uniform Rules In the event this court, it must comply with of Appeal. December contain all 2- 12. 2, file to seeks application a new Rules the or an 2- 18. 7 Rules application with documentation, and of be must of of Appeal. pertinent Uniform no that filed on and/ considered. Courts is or days application be not of Louisiana Rule new writ will relator must Any 21, this of the with There B) . and ( that Uniform ruling in open court so as to make the notice of intent August 13, 2021 timely. application of JJ. is timely under Rules Code for applying evidence that a judgment was ordered by the a 2021 33796. LANIER, Louisiana of Judicial No. this writ application LLC, Company, 23rd writs, Rules 06, AL Louisiana filed on Courts before or 2021 and must contain a copy of this ruling. JMM WIL Wolfe, proving judicata exists be of J., the is as the overruled judicata 54 is party the to of Police 772, valid and the res Dept., the judgment, any objection it Insurance final valid transcript Company ( judgment shows into that evidence, of AIG exception. reverse the res the judicata. could not Therefore, trial into I court' s Without meet would July record its burden 2021 exception of res judicata and deny same. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT the the grant 16, at this of the res on AIG a trial or on AIG' s judgment proof writ and filed, hearing final ruling PA. of offered, party Cir. of introduce to Review record. neither introduced any evidence exception collectively the Town incumbent was AIG) res must 1st App. cornerstone of doubt Landry v. La. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Specialty of If the maintained. the burden objection judicata, Because final The objection. 2010- 0673 ( 776. writ. the support lawsuit second So. 3d a would grant pleading application and Livingston and essential the on to 12/ 22/ 10), dissents facts on in the application, sustaining AIG' s
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
