Ampirical Solutions, L.L.C. VS Louisiana Department of Economic Development, State of Louisiana and Stephen Moret, In His Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Economic Development, State of Louisiana
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT AMPIRICAL SOLUTIONS, L. L. 0 2018 NO. CW 0731 VERSUS LOUSIANA DEPARTMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, OF LOUISIANA AND MORET, IN HIS SECRETARY OF STATE In OF ECOMOMIC OF OF STATE STEPHEN CAPACITY THE AS DEPARTMENT OCT 15 2018 DEVELOPMENT, LOUISIANA Re: State Lousiana, of Development, Department of GRANTED. WRIT the remanding The trial for LED") a full the applying for Court, District JJ. HIGGINBOTHAM, legal committed court of 636093. No. Louisiana the to matter the Development (" AND Economic of Secretary Judicial Rouge, MCCLENDON, PETTIGREW, BEFORE: Baton Department Development, 19th writs, East the Pierson, Don Economic of supervisory Parish Through and Department error in Economic of hearing and briefing, the at 2018 hearing on the LED' s Motion for Protective Order May 21, Regarding Discovery and Motion to Sever and Stay the Declaratory Judgment the claim of against P. of the remanded conduct testimony incurred this order The due is remanded the TMH JTP PMC OF APPEAL, DEt4t FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COUR COURT determination did of of the trial have See La. the is Civ. court' claim Development the whether hereby court receipt the s is to of plaintiff vacated, for at adequate Code underlying of process court trial Economic trial due not including to expenses" to proceedings. COURT of briefing, related research qualified the that " a denial claim. portion Department and documents thus, LED, the s before not process finding hearing and matter the Louisiana full a of constitutes L. L. C.' was Accordingly, the to which hearing. trial 2018 1, June order Solutions LED, the 1571. art. remand Ampirical 2018 the May 21, notice The Claim. merits and further
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
