Christine Brasher VS The Board of Supervisors for University of Louisiana at Lafayette and Jerry Luke LeBlanc, in his capacity as the Vice President of Administration and Finance of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT CHRISTINE 2018 NO. BRASHER CW 0271 VERSUS THE BOARD OF UNIVERSITY LAFAYETTE SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA AND JERRY LEBLANC, IN THE PRESIDENT VICE HIS ADMINISTRATION OF THE LUKE CAPACITY FINANCE OF LOUISIANA AT In Christine Where this proper burden is should forum 4th 1989) Cir. 255, 102 S. Ct. Baton trial be matter for the and in the of On East these back Baton to FIRST CIRCUIT D! YUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT 19th the choice General citing 271 ( 454 La. distance is 235, between minimal, made, we is and do a not more the ruling the 15th Judicial the to App. U. S. Lafayette reverse Lafayette, the Rouge. VGW APPEAL, showing proceedings JMM OF we of WRC COURT The that why show 44. 1055, 269, Parish the Liberty 41, initial Reyno, 1981). established Parish v. parish, v. Lincoln v. So. 2d Co. 419 ( to 1050, So. 3d Lafayette Accordingly, transferred Parish Aircraft have transferring Holland 541 one So. 2d 764 plaintiff' s 48 Co., than Cacamo transfer a the 10/ 19/ 10), L. Ed. 2d more a 13: 5104( A). R. S. 6/ 30/ 00), seeking determinative. Court in is Parish Rouge La. available." deference. to Parish forum. court District 70 252, defendants convenient Baton East of JJ. Baton See La. because Piper and not that party Construction Rouge therefore, find La. Highlines v. East be entitled CHUTZ, East venue granted 2010- 0038 ( Hosp., Lamb is the on AND established any 99- 3479 ( Co., Ins. The be choose may Fire writs, supervisory Parish Court, litigation. can venue Mut. of ORDER. WITH for V, plaintiffs motion McDONALD C. J., GRANTED venue for applying District 658462. No. WHIPPLE, WRIT Brasher, Judicial Rouge, proper MAY 2. 9 2018 LAFAYETTE 19th BEFORE: AS OF AND UNIVERSITY Re: FOR AT and Judicial of ORDER that District the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.