Billy Mulkey and Rochelle Mulkey (individually and on behalf of their minor child, Shelly Mulkey), Skylar Mulkey and Justin Mulkey VS Burnell Alessi, Sr., GEICO Casualty Company, State Farm General Insurance Company, Aaron Alessi, Jared Alessi, ABC Insurance Company and DEF Insurance Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT BILLY MULKEY OF THEIR SHELLY AND CW 1150 ON CHILD, SKYLAR MULKEY), MILKEY AND MINOR 2017 NO. ROCHELLE INDIVIDUALY MULKEY ( BEHALF AND JUSTIN MULKEY VERSUS BURNELL SR., ALESSI, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, STATE FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY, AND AND STATE FARM INSURANCE GENERAL COMPANY, JARED ALESSI, FARM AARON ABC ALESSI, INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE COMPANY In Jared Re: AND DEF FEBRUARY Alessi, Judicial HOLDRIDGE HIGGINBOTHAM, WRIT Parish Court, District Rouge, Baton East of 19th writs, supervisory 637329. No. BEFORE: for applying 2018 26, AND JJ. PENZATO, DENIED. GH TMH Penzato, to a de novo plaintiff' to extend his a Billy plaintiff, support a such him duty any custodian 966. Jared to or had of garde I of would Alessi' s summary at demonstrate to the judgment in for favor any burden failed to then shifted be trial that Jared that Jared writ, summary of was Civ. reverse OF APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT P. the judgment, Alessi, owed the art. ruling and dismissing plaintiff' s claims against him with prejudice. COURT carry Alessi Alessi Code Jared to able to factual produce will the of to plaintiff duty did not he La. an element duty a met out pointing of tractor. grant motion owed scope that proof by Alessi, essential an he The he and establish burden or harm. of Mulkey, Accordingly, denying grant of for support risk sufficient evidentiary summary Pursuant writ. Jared defendant, judgment particularly that the duty was owed, case, if that the grant would and believe on factual s even and, burden of absence I review, initial his dissents J., would thereby
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
