State Of Louisiana VS Anthony Armstead

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF 2017 N0. LOUISIANA KW 1183 VERSUS NOV 16 2017 ANTHONY In ARMSTEAD Re: District Judicial 09- 11- 0014. No. BEFORE: GRANTED not err sentence and district court PART 14: 31( B). delete the and to revise that determination is Corrections. La. 930. 2; 2052, assistance Strickland 2064, 80 was L. Ed. 2d Code La. Crim. excessiveness sentencing State, 45 So. 3d La. record 881. 2( A)( be See 1030 ( 1/ per 12/ 96), JEW FIRST CIRCUIT 0 W/- PUT FOR CL RK THE OF does that as Department on all his other his claims 687, defendant of meet Crim. 668, P. 104 may to court amendment Code La. A COURT COURT the at 2). State in v. curiarl); 665 time of the Furthermore, assistance raised Me OF APPEAL, relief U. S. 1964). MRT COURT 466 ineffective not relief. 93- 1380 ( the art. and postconviction 10/ 15/ 10), in P. may 674 ( to See La. I of art. S. Ct. not seek imposed in conformity with a plea agreement forth set entitled counsel. Washington, v. review of a sentence which is of the In seq. failed to et Relator as district the parole the of 15: 574. 4, See Count in This to entitled denied. parole on and The relator' s of restriction. amendment function R. S. is burden of showing that he ineffective is a ordering sentence order. of 893( 1k). art. eligibility, court suspension benefit the this district of by the commitment relator writ error amend parole the The P. contain this we record solely See this respects, on PART. Crim. without does not to Code commit Accordingly, implicate not La. IN benefits the served instructed minutes, See restriction is court DENIED however, did, sentence penalty provision R. S. AND JJ. THERIOT, disallowing probation. manslaughter the IN in AND WELCH, McCLENDON, WRIT did 19th applying for supervisory writs, Baton Rouge, Court, Parish of East Anthony Armstead, So. 2d of an State counsel application Cotton, 1172 ; plea. claims ex per 2009- 2397 ( rel. Melinie curiam). See of at for La. v.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.