Ronnie Hongo VS 20th Judicial District Court

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT RONNIE 2017 NO. HONGO K. CW 1325 VERSUS 20TH In JUDICIAL DISTRICT K. Ronnie Re: NOV 1 6 2017 COURT Hongo, for applying District Judicial supervisory Parish Court, of West 20th writs, No. Feliciana, 20086. WRIT the THERIOT WELCH, BEFORE: APPLICATION of submission 15: 1186( A)( R. S. La. REJECTED. certified a JJ. HOLDRIDGE, institutional or statement AND copy for equivalent the 1) requires fund trust the of account period six month In immediately preceding the filing of the writ application. the writ application must order to avoid posting the filing fee, of your proof contain inability to pay the fees in advance. Such proof can be provided by submitting copies of: 1. fully A compliance 2. with A filing the preceding appropriate prison for confined, compliance and Louisiana Courts this the to pay; district Any without The the application 2) the by in court required the is this filed, is being please GH APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT OPUTY CLERK OF COURT THE Uniform intends are the to Rules of this pursue documents copy of regarding his documents filed the COURT should court to court and process returned. include JEW FOR you contain not 4 - 5, Rule district unable MRT OF which the indicate the what result of the application the event documentation. application is in are being returned to you. COURT does required a from 15: 1186. relator provide filed sought This writ If immediately obtained in or court. been filing. such and ( application has relief required statement Equivalent) period institution R. S. application Appeal. account application the La. fund six month writ at include 1) must ( inability in of the with documents affidavit he the of official Additionally, claim, for and Institutional Certified equivalent 1); in Affidavit" Pauperis A)( trust the of copy Forma 5183 ( art. ACCOUNT - OF STATEMENT C. C. P. La. certified institutional In executed " all of In the documents a new that

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.