State Of Louisiana VS David Paul Carrere
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS PAUL Re: 0855 CARRERE Paul David 32nd BEFORE: Carrere, for applying District Court, Judicial writs, supervisory Parish Terrebonne, of 10 - FELY- 585626. No. WHIPPLE, WRIT DENIED It KW SEP` 2 2 2016 " DAVID In 2016 NO. C. J., IN that GUIDRY AND MaCLENDON, PART AND DENIED ON THE has JJ. SHOWING MADE IN PART. incorrectly request with the district court filed as a motion for discovery. A appears writ application proper the procedural Public to wants Records of individual public La. request seeking civil exhausted public from relief for proceedings level. See this writ of An felony a is permitted to grounds If first the at institute trial person a before custodian, must the relief 44: 31. 1. R. S. person Should the limited the mandamus 44: 35( A). R. S. La. by the who to postconviction La. Court, a for denied is person 44: 32. remedies is request file records request following 930. 3. art. records the 44: 31 & R. S. appellate the A seq. make sentence could P. et must La. his if records Crim. Code for See after a 44: 1, R. S. public proceeding is not the right to records under criminal records individual the which under has a establish La. custody who to access Law, records. in conviction to public a made in arising vehicle examine custodian upon relator court prevail, he should be prepared to pay the regular service fees for copies of the documents. proceeding, action, if ex 742 rel. McKnight So. 2d to the 894, 895 ( nature provide trial v. also of for court' documentation per trial seek may La. See to make postconviction on ruling which would the the be CIRCUIT c Q FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT lst the trial See additional Cir. claims, however, civil court' also s State 12/ 3/ 98), with the necessary to claims which relator filing the trial application, additional PMc EPUTY of App. regarding VGW FIRST La. relief JMG OF APPEAL, the 44: 35( C). relief; showing made. COURT appeal R. S. in rules curiam). appears postconviction s court an 98 - 2258 ( State, Thus, claims. the documentation any application his person desires. he Relator in After the and review are the are failed of court, an the additional merits denied on of the
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
