State Of Louisiana VS Terrance James Kelm

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

COURT COURT THE FOR OF CLERK 1 DEPUTY r / t" APPEAL, OF CIRCUIT FIRST COURT PMc VGW TMH 2568 2003- State, cognizable on where their C). 35(44: the in free S. R. appeal of a ruling civil 742 pay to A). 35(44: of State, the S. R. La. is records public records 2d So. to 98), 12/ 3/ enforcement procedures a criminal of part pursuant the to for files Requests JJ. err not If to person enforced be s attorney' did court trial HIGGINBOTHAM, AND McCLENDON St. of Parish writs, supervisory t f~_j J "- I! \ o14 ,_ q n r ~~ J nr- for Court, District applying Kelm, State, forth set Public Records the v. proceeding. of production production for motion DENIED. WRIT J., C. WHIPPLE, Judicial James S. R. must make La. in Law The by curiam) .per A 456903. Tammany, 44: 31 & the 2258 ( 98- S. R. district of person must Relator cannot mandamus at 32. 44: La. should the request C). 35(44: follow records." public in denying as a App. Should the custodian, the who desires 2d So. regular service first the request See trial before seeking Cir. 1st the fees institute custodian rel. ex State also McKnight the of examine 742 for public 895; at State for court civil relief from records. the La. See level. See the App. prevail, person he trial 1992). Cir. 1st rel. ex copies Insofar as proceeding, civil the After the should be relator has documents action, s court' if person v. Nash proceedings for Court, this denied 894 prepared a writ may trial documents. the of McKnight, the seek a held that requested contends he desires. he court issues in motion, the seeks a La. See 1054 ( 2d So. 604 La. the inmates are not postconviction claims were time La. review. collateral See State entitled to Louisiana copy of barred or documents Supreme Court the not rel. ex 26/ 3/ 04), 976 ( 2d So. 870 curiam).per v. Brown BEFORE: No. 22nd Terrance KELM JAMES Re: In TERRANCE VERSUS 1216 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE STATE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.