State Of Louisiana VS Johnny Paul Simon
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT COURT OF THE FOR CLERK DEPUTY S -~ LD CIRCUIT FIRST Uc~ APPEAL, OF COURT EGD MRT JMG proceedings. further is matter the granting his and her gave from in 266, driving number call it erratic or a case, they unless 2000), noted 10), 16/ 3/ La. general immediate concluded a justify dispatcher the dispatch, police to talked La. 24 ( obtain to detain name, his An or demand 688 96), 20/ 12/ 2d Ed.L. 20 detain the recognizes art. a and Cir. 1st conduct. criminal and P. for of had claim Jade from suspects La. defendant the that operator 911 the 10, of temporarily to right person Colarte, v. State 1, Ohio, S. U. 392 he who person enforcement and of stop as telephone DRAKE, AND 1968); interrogate of right well as 1,215. investigatory to she police requested driving, and stated See a police suicide, commit her 587, 2d So. v. Terry a law federal assistance concern has 591, complained admitted JJ. 688, 2d So. information denied, writ 0670 ( 96- call 690 ( the App. officer provided to provided informant the state over in 1989). Cir. 1st to stop defendant. the s defendant' the requisite that an officer s defendant' the suspicion. address, reasonably to order of 7, 24 an and 1015 ( 97- La. See the an presents 251. independently verify act Ct.S. exception such indicia 1981); La. of 1375, his of explanation Ct.S. 88 reasonable driving, erratic that La. App. 1868, to v. State actions jurisprudence, Crim. Code act on jurisdictions of Additionally, individual temporarily suspicion been and 97), 10/ 3/ 1874, the information the to on to an v. State information cooperation. his given right a Vincelli, v. State to report detail. Elliott, In reliability conveyed not need officer 197. 2d So. 701 889 from 21, 2d So. 555 Fauria, 393 the have the to to the have the Elliott, 1727 ( 2009- stop had 254 ( 2d Ed.L. 146 supreme on based In anonymous risk that vehicle. location, and the tips rule court reasonable s defendant' tipster, anonymous of 3d So. 35 the but instant of public the to remanded motion Accordingly, was instead that drunken that trial to the the v. Florida safety court name, s defendant' the from telephone L., J. that growing location, indicated for suppress trial corroborate that S. U. 529 constitutes and them is s court' Simon, Jade was not may police 120 a who not sufficient reversed, ruling of description name an this and drinking going was wherein he Simon GRANTED. WRIT The THERIOT, GUIDRY, BEFORE: 525561. No. Lafourche, of Parish writs, supervisory 2014 3 2 SEP .. for Court, District applying Judicial Louisiana, of 17th State SIMON Re: In PAUL JOHNNY VERSUS 1023 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE STATE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
