State Of Louisiana VS Lionel Williams, Jr.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THE FOR COURT DEPUTY OF ) CLERK too;; u fz. IL~ COURT APPEAL, OF CIRCUIT FIRST EGO MRT WJC relief. postconviction for application s relator' not entitled in denying for postconviction King, re Perez, re 3d F. 682 930 In States, United 3d F. 688 also S. U. 4 7 4 plea- in established the Ct.S. 104 first to right S. U. 466 668, the test of 1399, 2d Ed.L. 182 379 and Lafler 1376, concluded have courts JJ. of Parish writs, supervisory for S._, U. s._, u. DENIED. Judicial 2012) CRAIN, Cooper, _ WRIT BEFORE: No. 23rd Re: In Jr. , Williams, Lionel JR. 2014 82 UL because v. Missouri Frye,_ ct.s. 132 Court, District effective do " not DRAKE, AND THERIOT applying 366, articulated they] merely a ~ announce Federal in assistance 000104. CR- 00Assumption, of 878, context v. Strickland applied ew Ct.S. 132 398 ( 2d Ed.L. 182 2012) v. the rule 879 ( bargaining 2052, 674 ( 2d Ed.L. 80 in 1984), counsel to 2012) ( Cir. 11th 2012). Cir. 7th v. Hill Washington, Sixth Amendment constitutional law a 2012) ( Cir. 1985) ." 203 ( 2d Ed.L. 88 and according to relief hearing curiam).per See v. Hare 52, and the on curiam); per In Lockhart, Ct. S. 6 10 his untimely Accordingly, relator was 1189 ( 3d F. 697 5th trial d d:. court not err application WILLIAMS, LIONEL VERSUS 0707 KW 2014 NO. LOUISIANA OF CIRCUIT FIRST APPEAL, OF COURT LOUISIANA OF STATE STATE
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
