In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Scott Vogt
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT IN MEDICAL RE: FOR THE CLAIM REVIEW OF PANEL SCOTT 2014 NO. CW 1003 VOGT SEP 0 8 2014 In Re: 21st KUHN, WRIT the notice in and Rules Uniform 2014, or there however, court within 10 notice of and 4- 3 . that days a Code La. Code Civ.. P. more than of the Uniform court P. a made In the Court, this for a court 2014, timely, or must Courts Louisiana on and before seeks to all Any Rule with 22, 2014, JEW JEK APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT 4- 5, writ court as so and of a was under ( filed make the Rules 4- 2 B) . and/ or Rules an 4- 9 and Appeal . new pertinent original 2- 12 . 2, application with documentation, writ application Uniform Rules of new application must be filed and must contain a copy of this JTP OF file the show ruling. COURT Courts to comply September days ruling; to application writ Louisiana Appeal . of 30 ordered by the judgment timely 1914 ( A) contain must documentation including was it of relator event 1914 art . oral an judgment was open art . this of Rules under Appeal, pertinent application for rehearing will not be considered. 2- 18 . 7, of with Rule comply that Appeal, in the copy in ruling on June 25, Civ. Supplementation timely was Courts that to request written filed proof filed La. was of trial the the of intent See a is no evidence that or of The matter came for hearing on May 19, transcript. time Parish provide Louisiana of Courts contain to 2014, 25, of failed Relators not failed intent of Louisiana of which at trial a Rules provisions notice does application minutes the The hearing. the after with B) . ( supervisory Court, JJ. June on Uniform 4- 3, WELCH, Relator filed intent of accordance A) AND CONSIDERED. and 4- 2 Rules for applying District 2014- 0091 . PETTIGREW, NOT DDS, Judicial No. Tangipahoa, BEFORE: White, C. Dustin Dr. writs,
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
