Phyllis B. Creel VS United Fire & Indemnity Company and the Haydel Chiropractic Clinic
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT PHYLLIS 2014 NO. CREEL B. CW 0837 VERSUS UNITED AND THE CHIROPRACTIC In INDEMNITY FIRE & COMPANY HAYDEL Phylis Re: JUL Z 9 2014. CLINIC Creel, B. Judicial for applying District supervisory Parish Court, 32nd writs, No. Terrebonne, of 165740 . DENIED. WRIT sidewalk is least Haydel been the defect Defendants knowledge deviation in of, the v. nor in deviation Doucet, produced a 2014- 0879 evidence that had he received landing, nor any had concrete involving accidents or Jenkins dangerous . no prior any years . ten had JJ. minor So. 3d about complaints DRAKE, every unreasonably Patrick there AND Not 6/ 30/ 14) , La. Dr. THERIOT CRAIN, BEFORE: the deviation the writ. in at WJC Theriot, J. , dissents J., Drake, concurs . reverse the May 8, partial and to The demonstrate whether the Haydel that unreasonable risk constructive notice ex rel. Office So. 3d OF of of D APPEAL, PUTY FOR CLERK THE OF of issues contained harm, this State and a defect Plaintiff fact that defendants defect . 2012- 1238 I would court granting the Fire & Indemnity material whether Buildings, trial United Clinic. of alleged CIRCUIT COURT COURT of the Chiropractic of FIRST grant favor 175 . COURT in genuine premises would judgment judgment summary Company 2014 and able as presented had Broussard ( La. was exist actual v. 4/ 5/ 13) , to an or State 113
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
