State Of Louisiana VS Scott Lee Brown
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA N0 2013 KW 1410 VERSUS SCOTT In LEE Re OcT V 2Q 3 BROWN Scott Lee Brown applying for supervisory writs 17th Judicial District Court Parish of Lafourche No C 514444 BEFORE WRIT WHIPPLE J C WELCB AND CRAIN DENIED Relator appears to JJ seek review of the denial of his pro se motion Yor speedy trial and to force his or to file the same motion When a defendant is appointed attorney is not clear whether or not represented by counsel and it counsel joins in the pre pro se motion verdict filed by the defendant the trial court is required to accept and consider the motion p the motion wi11 not lead to confusion at ovided trial 466 See State Melon v the 2209 95 95 22 9 660 2d So in s relator provided application supports a finding that relator counsel did not s join in the filing of the pro se motion for speedy trial Herein documentation La JEW VGW Crain J concurs COURT OF APPEP L FIRST CIRCUIT rz Ce l EPUTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
