State Of Louisiana VS Mary Ann Douglas
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA 2013 NO KW 10i9 VERSUS MARY U27 1 i DOUGLAS ANN sa In Mary Ann Douglas Re Judicial No BEFORE applying for supervisory writs District Court Parish of West Baton 18th Rouge 3542 11 PARRO GUIDRY AND DRAKE JJ WRIT NOT CONSIDERED Relator failed to comply with Uniform 5 7 8 Appeal Rules 4 C 6 10 and 11 by failing to provide this Court with a copy of the March 7 2013 ruling by the trial court the trial court s reasons if any pertinent court minutes all motions and court Rules of Louisiana documents pertinent indictment s relator in Additionally does service d ar counsel not include the of court Rule A 5 4 order the Rules of of opposing although it is Furthermore judge affidavit numbers telephone Uniform the issue date return signed a evidence crimes other and of trial violation a the to violation not the of Courts we note that relator failed to include a copy of any pertinent transcripts which would be necessary to review his claims See City of Baton Rouge v 433 Plain Ct S 246 2d So 710 78 L 235 2d Ed of Supplementation application Rules of for rehearing Louisiana cert La Courts this ruling In the this will of JMG EGD DEPUTY FOR CLERK FIRST CIRCUIT THE OF COURT COURT S U 896 104 not be application or and an considered items relator 7 18 2 See Uniform 9 4 Any the entire contents noted above and a copy elects to file a new the application must be filed on or RHP 1 writ Appeal Rules should include event application with this Court before Septerr 24 2013 er COURT OF APPEAL 464 1983 future filing on this issue of this application the missing of denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
