Glenn Rodgers VS U-Haul Co. of Louisiana, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT GLENN 2013 CW N0 RODGERS 1508 VERSUS HAUL U C0 OF LoUZSZANA ET Npy p 8 2013 AL Haul U In Re Judicial 19th writs Baton Rouge PARRO BEFORE WRIT 26 The is Parish Court of East 608453 TAERIOT AND DRAKE JJ judgment of Haul U denying judgment summary No supervisory for applying District KUHN HIGGINBOTHAM GRANTED 2013 Louisiana of Co Company reversed and the of the trial court motion is dated June motion s Louisiana for There granted are no genuine issues of material fact and U is entitled to Haul judgment as Court This a matter finds as of La law follows 1 Code The Civ actions P of art B 966 Haul U Company of Louisiana were not the cause of the injuries alleged fact in herein 2 U Company of Louisiana did not owe a legal duty Haul to the plaintiff events were not G1enn Rodgers and 3 The alleged chain of foreseeable MRT EGD RHP JEK Hiqqinbotham of writ the J dissents and would not application finding that demonstrated the application was timely filed COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT c D UTY FOR CLERK THE OF COURT COURT reach relator the merits has not
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
