Ginger Jones VS Franklin M. Woolf and The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT GINGER JONES NO 2013 CW 0370 VERSUS FRANKLIN M TRAVELERS OF WOOLF AND THE INDEMNITY COMPANY CONNECTICUT qpR 2 2 2Q93 Ginger In Re applying for Judicial District Court Baton BEFORE Jones 19th Rouge WHIPPLE WRIT rather heard as Motion ORDER regarding date Pleadings We caption note the are JJ treated matter was by also Limine in question it is inappropriate for the trial Dr s Wyatt testimony relating to his exclude to treatment of Ginger fact James The affect the weight admissibility IIi TL PMc COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT z EPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR of outstanding issues the testimony not of its The Motion to Reconsider is hereby GRANTED VGW F AND HIGGINBOTAAM David is testimony of Dr Wyatt hereby Due to the outstanding issues of material fact whether there was one accident or two accidents reversed material East the excluding court in writs of The trial court ruling of s 2013 denying the Motion for Reconsideration of for Partial Summary Judgment in Limine Motion a February 8 the Motion on the WITH than Parish 793 582 J C MeCLENDON GRANTED substance No supervisory THE COURT
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
