Michael Dixon VS James La'blanc, Secretary Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana Corrections Services, Richard Deville, Caldwell Detention Center; Delana Beckley, South Louisiana Correctional Center; Warden Drew, J. B. Evans Correctional Center; S
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 CA 0332 MICHEL DIXON VERSUS BLANC LA SECRETARY LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS LOUISIANA CORRECTION SERVICES RICHARD DEVILLE CALDWELL DETENTION CENTER DELANA BECKLEY SOUTH LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL CENTER WARDEN DREW J EVANS B CORRECTIONAL CENTER SHIRLEY PAILETTE LA SALLE CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION LEROY HOLLIDAY CATAHOULA CORRECTIONAL CENTER PAT BOOKS RICHWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER CLOVIS TILLERY RIVER CORRECTIONAL CENTER RICHARD SPINNER DATE OF JUDGMENT SEP 10 2010 ON APPEAL FROM THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER 582 SECTION 26 PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE 620 STATE OF LOUISIANA HONORABLE KAY BATES JUDGE Michel Dixon Plaintiff Appellant Pine Prairie Louisiana Pro Se William Kline Counsel for Defendant Appellee Louisiana Department of Public Baton Rouge Louisiana Safety and Corrections BEFORE PARRO KUHN AND PETTIGREW JJ Disposition AFFIRMED KUHN J Plaintiff appellant Michel Dixon an inmate in the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections appeals the district court judgment s dismissing his petition for judicial review without prejudice for lack of subject matter appellate jurisdiction Mindful that plaintiff has not filed a petition seeking a mandamus to have any responsible party directed to respond to a timely and properly filed ARP request we find no error in the conclusion of the district court that he has failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required under La S 1172 R 15 1176 and 1178 Thus the district court judgment is affirmed in accordance with La Uniform Rules of the Courts of AppealRule 2 1 2A 16 2 5 and 6 Appeal costs are assessed against plaintiff appellant Michel Dixon AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
