State Of Louisiana VS Mark Ellis Redman
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 KA 1668 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MARK ELLIS REDMAN Judgment Rendered t JW MAY 2 2DDe Appealed from the Thirty Second Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of Terrebonne State of Louisiana Trial Court Number 443 650 Honorable Timothy C Ellender Judge Presiding Counsel for Joseph L Waitz Jr District Attorney Appellee State of Louisiana Ellen Daigle Doskey Assistant District Attorney Houma LA Bertha M Hillman Counsel for Defendant Appellant Thibodaux LA Mark Ellis Redman BEFORE WHIPPLE GUIDRY AND HUGHES JJ GUIDRY J The defendant Mark Ellis Redman four of counts violations of La R S looting plea of not guilty The trial confessions andor statements entered a plea of guilty defendant to as twelve years charged by bill of information with 14 62 5 The defendant withdrew his charged as to imprisonment each at count appeals arguing now to suppress his following reasons affirm the convictions and on each sentenced the count to that the trial confessions andlor and guilty plea court a his to suppress not The trial hard labor denying the motion we The defendant entered denied the defendant s motion court The defendant concurrently was be served court erred in For the statements sentences STATEMENT OF FACTS As the defendant entered offenses are not or about Thomas a The fully developed bill of information and On guilty pleas in following the instant case of facts is based statement testimony presented during the motion September 16 2004 Detective the facts of the to suppress of the home of Dawn Gautreaux that took during the name was located under the carport of the residence transported the defendant advised of and to rights and the report of was bearing the defendant s After being waiver of rights questioning a regarding the burglary discovered that other evacuated homes had been Complex a to The detectives located and the sheriffs office for second interview of the defendant Parish Criminal Justice advised of his storm a statement After the detectives a a waiving his rights including the execution of form the defendant gave burglarized of hearing place after the home A bill of sale evacuated course the Cody Voisin and Detective Lieutenant Cope of the Terrebonne Parish Sheriffs Office responded burglary on was conducted of Ashland Jail second waiver of rights form 2 at the Terrebonne The defendant was executed was agam During the motion to suppress hearing crack cocaine and consumed alcoholic Further arrest residences and the during two the homes in order sheds beverages on The defendant admitted to exchange it for crack cocaine to the date of the offenses and hearing the defendant admitted residences anything sell for I the defendant stated to the defendant testified that he used was to stealing a into breaking two gun out of one of When asked about the other just looking for anything quick to take dope ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR In the sole erred in the defendant contends that the trial court the motion to suppress his confessions andor statements denying assignment of The defendant argues that due the circumstances his and to his error drug use alcohol statements were not made consumption and the knowingly willingly totality of freely or voluntarily DISCUSSION At the suppress but did motion to reserve the state outset we note right to and federal jurisdictional by appeal 1976 or objected the time of the not jurisprudence defects 1100 an La not appellate at court State the time of waive his to the ruling on on appeal Under both right to 3 a the review of will review that 1982 entering ruling non review thereof either Crosby 338 So v the guilty plea expressly unqualified plea of guilty waives all by post conviction remedy the entering occurring prior thereto and precludes When the defendant plea ruling at have the denial of the motion reviewed stipulates that he does 1099 that the defense counsel 2d 584 588 La guilty plea expressly a non State v jurisdictional pre Moore 420 So 2d In the and never suppress Boykin colloquy the defendant unconditionally admitted his guilt once mentioned any intent State v not App 1st Cir For the above reasons this preserved App v Alabama 395 U S 238 89 S Ct 1709 23 L Ed 2d 274 4 1969 to State v La writ denied 530 assignment of error is appellate review Boykin the motion for review 1st Cir CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES AFFIRMED 1 on writ denied 599 So 2d 315 Thornton 521 So 2d 598 600 La So 2d 85 La 1988 to appeal the ruling Under the circumstances the issue is Jackson 597 So 2d 526 529 La 1992 to not subject
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
